Joachim Steingrubner
writes:


But if one's stance towards the world is to be based //only// on the first statement, it makes Buddhism as about only developing a one-fold training (wisdom) rather than a three-fold training (moral virtue, meditation and wisdom), and being totlally passive.

On the second statement: sure, there are lots of spiritually-wasting ways of being involved in political matters, but need this include work on a basically //moral// front, relating to human rights?